Thursday, June 10, 2010

Jamaat Islami Amir called for bombing of the Nato Trucks

Keeping its tradition of calling for disorder in the land, Jamaat Islami Amir Mr. Munawwar Hasan in his Friday sermon of June 6, 2010 called for the bombing NATO caravans.  As ususal the tragedy of Pakistan is that there are plenty of idiots who say "labbaik" on such calls.  The exact words of Mr. Munawwar were:

"... Those who only talk about following what Allah and His prophet (peace be on him) has said need to realize that this task (referncing the NATO operations in Afghanistan) will beome more difficult over time.  We have so far tolerated the drone attacks while our folks were not even getting food to eat.  Very rarely, if ever, do we hear a news that a NATO caravan has been attackedEverything goes there after traveling through our country.  If NATO is fighting Muslims, they are doing so with the help of Muslims which include you and I.  Do you think Allah will not ask us on the day of judgement that (NATO) tankers were moving towards Afghanistan right in front of your eyes and you did not do anything?  They were huge trucks that carried food and supplies for the NATO troops.  This was happening when you yourself were living a life of extreme poverty.  You had opened up all of your roads for them to travel.  A lot of roads have been constructed in Baluchistan province to allow the NATO caravans to travel.  These roads have been built for the benefit of these caravans and not for your benefit. ..." (minutes 33:00 till 34:22).  After that he went on to glorify the current Jihadi movements.

Then on June 9, 2010 militants attacked dozens of trucks carrying NATO supplies in Pakistan near Islamabad.  The assault killed seven people.  All victims are believed to be Pakistani.  According to the news:

Militants and ordinary criminals have often attacked NATO and U.S. supply convoys over the past two years, but Wednesday's strike was the first so close to the well-protected capital, something likely to cause particular unease 

The full news can be read at http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/06/09/523041/militants-attack-nato-convoy-in.html

The Friday sermon can be heared in its entirety from http://www.smunawar.com/ (unless they remove it)

So, is this excusable?  Are these Pakistanies doing Jihad by blowing up NATO tankers within Pakistan and killing Pakistanis?  What is Jamaat Islami preaching? and should Pakistanis standy by and accept such calls for rebellion within the borders of Pakistan?  Why do Pakistanis act surprised when attacks happen in Pakistan.  The Mullahs are not hiding their agenda - they say in clear terms that "war is on" - it is the "silent majority" that needs to say something.  It should be a simple principled stance that no one is allowed to create disorder in the land (which is exactly according to Quran) regardless of their beliefs or policy differences.

Saturday, June 05, 2010

Jamat Islami hijacking "qaum's" sentiments

http://jamaat.org/beta/site/general_detail/news/1007

The Jamaat Islami's English website did not have a translation, so I have translated it below for English Speaking audience:

Nation will not tolerate a soft corner for Qadianies.  Mian Nawaz Sharif's statement has hurt the feelings of the nation.
 Spokes Person, Jamaat Islami
Lahore 5 June 2010.  Dr. Fareed Ahmad Paracha, spokesman Jamaat Islami Pakistan, has expressed deep regret over the statement of the president of Pakistan Muslim League (N) Mr. Nawaz Sharif where Mr. Sharif called Qadianies his brethren and an asset for Pakistan.  In his statement released from Mansoora, Mr. Paracha said that the whole Muslim world and Pakistan agree over the issue of declaring the Qadianies  non-Muslim.  And the nation will not tolerate a soft corner for the Qadianies.  He said that the damage caused by Qadianies to Islam and Muslim Umma is unforgivable.  He also said that Qadianies have dared to blaspheme against the Holy Prophet and in this regard they are continuing in their efforts.  Mr. Paracha said that Mian Nawaz Sharif's statement at this time, when the whole Muslim world is in a state of deep shock due to the cartoon controversy, has deeply hurt the feelings of the nation.   Any expression of solidarity with the Qadianies, who blaspheme against the Holy Prophet, must be condemned.  He said that Qadianies once again have launched a campaign to regain their status as a Muslim, to end the Anti-Qadiani ordinance, and to end the blasphemy laws.  And in this regard they are doing press conferences.  Mr. Paracha sad that Mr. Sharif's statement must be seen in this backdrop.  Mr. Paracha said that Mr. Nawaz Sharif must clarify his position regarding the status of the Qadianies, blasphemy laws, and anti-Qadiani ordinance. 

And to put things in context, here is what Mr. Nawaz Sharif said:

He also termed terrorists attack at the worship places of Ahmadis in model town and Ghari Shahu condemnable adding that Ahmadis are our brethren and asset for the country. He also informed that the elements involved in firing at Ahmadis worship places have been arrested and law enforcement agencies have been carrying out investigations with them.

So what is "qaum's" reaction to such a statement?  With respect to the allegations against the Ahmadi Muslims an honest reader is welcome to decide for themselves based on our literature.  Our website http://www.alislam.org has a lot of books on the subject.  Here is a sample:

And specifically addressing the cartoon controversy, our present leader Ameer-ul-Momineen Hadrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad's writings and lectures:
Here is a list of several books on the subject http://www.alislam.org/holyprophet/index.html

In addition to this Ahmadi Muslims all over the world were busy in using their pen in defense of our beloved prophet (sa) and doing seminars to celebrate his life in addition to educating the western public about the sensitivity of the issue while other groups were rioting in Muslim world over the issue.


An organization that calls itself "Jamaat Islami" (Organization for Islam) has made lies its core value and instigation along with rebellion its mode of operation.  Inna lillah e Wa inna Illaihi rajeoon

And there are several other books on the subject that you can see at http://www.alislam.org/books/


Tuesday, June 01, 2010

Hypocrisy of the Pakistani Muslims

Ever wonder why the suide bombers are always so young?  Do the "virgins" in heaven have a prejudice against middle age and older men?  Shouldn't a terrorist in his fifties or sixties be more inclined to rush to "heaven"?

The reason is that the ideology that is taught in Pakistan's "Islamic Studies" demands a degree of hypocricy from the students that younger age is unable to provide.  Following concepts are openly taught in public schools by such teachers.  The message is even more direct and extreme in the Madrasas and during the Friday sermons:

  1. Apostacy (giving up Islam as one's religion) is a crime that is punnishable by death
  2. Blasphemy against Prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) is a crime that is punnishable by death.  Note that this is supported by the laws in Pakistan as well and laws do not define blasphemy thus leaving the laws open for abuse. 
  3. Ahmadies are not Muslims.  This is also supported by the laws of Pakistan.  2nd ammendment to the Pakistan constitution declares Ahmadi Muslims to be non-Muslim.  Since Ahmadies call themselves Muslim, this automatically turns them into apostates in the eyes of common folk.
  4. Pakistan is an "Islamic" country and it is bound by her constitution to implement Islamic laws.
Capital punnishment in any society is reserved for the worst crimes.  What is a sixteen year old supposed to make out of these instructions that are taught in public schools?  Isn't that sixteen year old justified in thinking that it is his duty to stop these crimes?  How can Pakistan as a whole claim innocence when such crimes are committed?  Some "mullahs" say "but we don't teach them to kill, we just teach them the rules but tell them that it is the duty of the state not of the individuals".  That is the worst type of hypocricy and they have the nerve to say this in public on public televisions as an excuse that absolves them.  The media anchor on the other end just agrees with them.  What a sad story!

Rebellions have happened in many societies throughout the history and in that Taliban are not a new phenomenon.  What is interesting is that Taliban hit at the heart of those they want to revolutionize and those who are getting hit still sympathize with them.  The society as a whole has created an "assembly line" where if drones kill 10 taliban, Madrisas graduate 100.  The so called "moderates" in Pakistan then make it their duty to find excuses for the Taliban or blame someone else; India and US are common scapegoats.

Pakistan is suffering from a cancer but sadly the people think it is just a common cold which will go away if only if US stops drone attacks.  First Pakistanis need to realize that it is a cancer and that they themselves are feeding the cancer - not someone from outside.  They need to confront their hypocricy and turn their "religious principles" to:

  1. Pakistan guarentees absolute religions freedom where everyone can follow whatever religion they follow.
  2. Freedom of thought and speech is absolute and no one is going to be punnished for "blasphemy"
  3. State has no business in defining people's religions.  If someone wants to consider Ahmadies as non-Muslims, they are free to do so but "for the purpose of constitution", Muslim is anyone who claims to be so.
Unless Pakistanis change their thought process on these lines, they need to realize that there is still a lot of room for Pakistan to drop.  Looks like "Asfala Safileen" applies to Pakistan quite aptly.

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's revelations about Lahore

Following are some of the revelations of Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) Promissed Messiah and Mehdi about Lahore.  I am including the words as they exist in Tadhkira (http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Tadhkirah.pdf) without any editorial comments.  Only Allah understands the complete meaning and implications of such prophecies.  May Allah have mecy on us.

  1. Tadhkira Page 514
    • December 13, 1900 There are our pure members in Lahore. They should be informed. They are made of fine clay. Doubt will be removed but the clay will remain. In the context of the acceptance of revelation the weakest was the maulavi. All maulavis will be exposed. [Arabic] [I am Allah the Bountiful. I shall certainly stand with My Messenger.] [al-Hakam, vol. 4, no. 45, December 17, 1900, p. 2]
  2. Tadhkira Page 514
    • December 13, 1900
    We have pure friends in Lahore. Doubt has arisen but the clay is fine; doubt will be removed but the clay will remain. [al-Hakam, vol. 4, no. 29, August 17, 1902, p. 12]
    • Tadhkira Page 919
      • February 20, 1907 (1) [Arabic] I shall stand with My Messenger and shall rebuke the one who rebukes him. (2) [Urdu] A scattered host. (3) [Urdu] A sorrowful news has been received. The Promised Messiah[as] said: It passed through my mind, after I woke up, that this last revelation might relate to some of our friends in Lahore. The revelation might possibly have the same import.
    • Tadhkira Page 955
      • [Urdu] A sad piece of news has been received from Lahore. Because of the revelation, I sent a man to Lahore to find out about our friends there, but one did not know that the revelation would be fulfilled a few days later. [Badr, vol. 6, no. 27, July 4, 1907, p. 7]
    • Tadhkira Page 1060
      • [Urdu] There used to be a city called Lahore as well.     Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: The prophecy about the destruction of Lahore that was published during the life of the Promised Messiahas is the following:  
        It is said that the soil of Lahore contains elements which exterminate the plague germs. But plague has also taken hold there. People still do not know, but after several years they will see what will happen. A number of people and villages will be completely wiped out. The world will forget about them and there will remain no trace of them. But such would never be the case with Qadian. 
          [al-Hakam, vol. 8, no, 23 and 24, July 17, 24, 1904, p. 12]  

    Thursday, February 04, 2010

    Talibanization of Europe Part 2

    I had earlier commented on the Swiss intolerance when they banned religious buildings of a certain type (http://saadahmad.blogspot.com/2009/12/talibanization-of-swiss.html). An interesting twist to that story was that even though most of the world, including European Union, condemned that – there was one certain bigot from France that said that he understood it; who was he? French president Sarkozy (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/08/sarkozy-sympathises-minaret-ban-switzerland)


    Just like a TV drama, this European bigotry now enters it next episode and now Sarkozy’s France takes the lead. Target – Muslim women who choose to dress a certain way (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/19/veil-burka-france-muslim-women). What a way to liberate women – by taking away their freedom to dress the way they want. Our president Obama puts it correctly when he said: “It is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit – for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We cannot disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism…”.

    And just like the Swiss vote, this is not a marginal section of French population that is suggesting it. Over 57% of the French in a survey favored such a ban – what a liberal society. A woman becomes naked in public to please the male audience – she is liberated; another woman covers herself so that she is judged for who she is – French cannot tolerate her on the street.

    These episodes are not isolated. This is a European phenomena and the next episode is already in the works. This time the equation of bigotry from among the Taliban style Muslims and Hitler’s Europe goes head to head in Netherlands (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5814DH20090902). Here a heartless Arab group published some cartoons about the holocaust – they are being charged for being “discriminatory” but the same nation took pride in republishing the cartoons of Prophet Muhammad under the guise of freedom of speech.

    Our country needs to look at these episodes with grave concern. Europe has a history of such attitudes towards its own citizens. For hundreds of years they have taken pride in such actions. As always they would make a mess and then we will be called in to fix it for them. The people who want to cover themselves a certain way in France or want to build their places of worship a certain way in Switzerland are born and bred in those countries. How is the behavior of these “enlightened” countries any different from the Taliban in Afghanistan who wanted to impose their “sharia” on their citizens. It is these attitudes which when left unchecked lead to the wide spread hostilities later on and may even lead to another holocaust and then people would wonder how they missed the signs!