Sunday, January 09, 2011

Muslim scholars - judged by the blasphemy laws

Most Muslims - especially those in Pakistan think that the laws against blasphemy are justified.  Those who are deemed "progressive" only want procedural changes.  So in this post I will take some quotes from the scholars of Islam and indicate the clauses of the blasphemy law of Pakistan that they have violated.  Keep visiting this blog as I would build on it.

Syed Abul Ala Maudoodi
He is the founder of the "Jamat Islami".  One of his basic philosophies was that in order to reform the society control over the government is essential.  Lets see some of his quotes:

(Hadrat Ayesha (ra)) had become too bold against the Holy Prophet (pbuh) and had started to raise her voice against the Holy Prophet (pbuh).  [Weekly Asia Lahore 1957.  Volume 15 - Page 17].  Blasphemy Law 298-A applies
Hadrat Abu Bakr acted against the spirit of Islam [Tarjaman ul Quran Volume 12].  Blasphemy Law 298-A applies
Hadrat Usman was guilty of giving special treatment to his friends and relatives and gave them special considerations.  [Khilafat o Malookiat pp 105].   Blasphemy Law 298-A applies 
Brailvies vs Deobandies
Brailvies are a subsect of Hanafi sect which is one of the subsects of the Sunnis.  In Pakistan JUI (Noorani) is one of the prominent religious political party that belongs to this school.  The founder of Awami Tehreek Dr. Tahir ul Qadri also belongs to this sect.
Deobandies are another subsect of the Hanafi sect.  The "Tableeghi" jamat in Pakistan, Majlis Ihraar and Majlis Tahafuz Khatm-e-Nabuwwat are all offshoots of this sect.

Here are some of the beliefs of Brailvies:
  • Holy Prophet (pbuh) did not have a shadow.
  • Holy Prophet (pbuh) knew ghaib (or that which is unknown or known only to God
And in contrast the Deobandies consider the Holy Prophet (pbuh) as a human being and subject to the limitations and deny the two beliefs about the Holy Prophet (pbuh)

Blasphemy Law 295-C applies - it just depends on who files the complaint!

Founder of Deobandi Sect - Maulana Muhammad Qasim
"Hypothetically speaking if a new prophet comes after the Holy Prophet (pbuh), even then the Khatam-e-Nabuwwat of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) will remain intact" [Tehzeer-ul-Nas pp 28]
It is interesting that the founder of the Deobandi sect says this but this is where the Majlis Tahaffuz-e-Khatam-e-Nabuwwat started.  People need to understand that this stuff is politically motivated!

Anyways, since all Ahmadies are subjected to 295-C why should he be spared!

Hadrat Shah Waliullah
He does not need any introduction.  He says:
"(Khatam-e-Nabuwwat means that) after the Holy Prophet (pbuh) a prophet with a new law cannot come" (Tafheemat-e-Ilahiya pp 55)
Same belief as Ahmadies so  295-C applies.

Why stop here, lets apply these to the companions of the Holy Prophet (pbuh)
  • When Hadrat Ayesha (ra) was accused, during that time several companions would come under the jurisdiction of 298-A.  Since this law does now allow the accused to provide an explanation, the fact that later on all of these companions changed their point of view is irrelevant.
  • Recall the war between the two groups of the companions of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) where Hadrat Ayesha was on one side and Hadrat Ali was on the other - 298-A  applies on both sides.
  • After compiling the Holy Quran, Hadrat Usman burnt the copies of the Holy Quran that were not according to the final prepared manuscript.  295-B  applies.
Conclusion
The so called moderates need to realize that they cannot hide behind words in this case.  The problem is the law itself and not procedural matters.  The law itself invites abuse.  This law did not exist in Pakistan from 1947 to 1985 - did we see blasphemy rampant in Pakistan during that time?  And since 1985 we have thousands of case - what is the reason?

The law also creates heroes because the death penalty is reserved for the most heinous crimes in any society.  All societies give some latitude to a person who would take law in their own hands when the crime in question warrants the death penalty.  Such people are often defended under "temporary insanity".  The mere existence of this law puts someone who speaks their mind on a religious matter in the same category as a murderer and that should not be acceptable to any decent human being.

While conversing with Pakistanis, they often think that such laws cannot be touched or that they are too volatile.  Well mark my words unless these laws and other laws like these are repealed totally and completely, extremism will increase.  Ofcourse most Pakistanis will be quick to blame the west for every ill in Pakistan but do some basic study and see extremism in Pakistan before and after 1985.

You can refer to http://saadahmad.blogspot.com/2011/01/mess-called-blasphemy-laws-of-pakistan.html to see the text of these clauses.

Thursday, January 06, 2011

The mess called "Blasphemy Laws of Pakistan"

During the first week of January 2011, Governor of the largest province of Pakistan, Punjab was assassinated by his own security guard because he had called for modifications in Pakistan blasphemy laws.  Note that his stance was quite guarded as he did not call for its repeal but just modification.  I would consider his stance below par but in Pakistan even getting that much was no less than a miracle.

After that his assassin became a hero.  Even people living in US, Canada, and Europe were hesitant in calling this what it was.  Pakistan President and chief minister of Punjab did not attend the funeral of the governor.  Leaders of several parties openly said that the governor was to be blamed for his own death.

Quite sadly, majority of the people of Pakistan support these "blasphemy laws" and they have no idea about what is in it.  So here it goes (These are taken from http://www.pakistani.org/pakistan/legislation/1860/actXLVof1860.html):

Section 295-B
Whoever wilfully defiles, damages or desecrates a copy of the Holy Qur'an or of an extract therefrom or uses it in any derogatory manner or for any unlawful purpose shall be punishable with imprisonment for life.


Section 295-C
Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by visible representation or by any imputation, innuendo, or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.




Section 298
Whoever, with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of any person, utters any word or makes any sound in the hearing of that person or makes any gesture in the sight of that person or places any object in the sight of that person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year or with fine, or with both.


Section 298-A
Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by visible representation, or by any imputation, innuendo or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of any wife (Ummul Mumineen), or members of the family (Ahle-bait), of the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him), or any of the righteous Caliphs (Khulafa-e-Rashideen) or companions (Sahaaba) of the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.


Now many Pakistanis will read this and say "so what is wrong with that?"  So lets see some scenarios:

  1. Defiles or "damages" Quran or an "extract".  You do not need to be a rocket scientist to see how ridiculous such a language is.  The word "kafir" (disbeliever) is in Quran so is the word for Satan.  Similarly many authors start their writings with "Bismillah" (in the name of Allah) and several newspapers carry some extracts of Quran and then later on these same newspapers are found on the street corner.  
  2. Directly or "indirectly"  "defiles" the sacred "name" of the Holy Prophet (sa).  Again the language is very ambiguous and about a few weeks ago a person was charged for throwing a business card with name "Muhammad" written on it.  Really it is not a joke.  And what about "indirectly" - it makes it completely subjective.  For example I find it offensive to say as some Muslims suggest that Holy Prophet (sa) did not have shadow because it questions his humanity; should I then press charges against everyone that holds that belief?  Some Muslims suggest that at certain times the Holy Prophet (sa) lied as a strategy - I find it offensive and so on.  Personality that is accepted as the most influential in the history of humanity will generate controversy - even among Muslims.  I find those who suggest that the Holy Prophet (sa) used sword to spread the message of Islam (as suggested by Maulana Maudoodi) to be the most offensive accusation against Islam!
  3. Defiling the sacred name of the wives of the Prophet - can anyone guess who is this targeted for?  The conflict that arose between Hadrat Ayesha and Hadrat Ali is a historical fact and different Muslims have different perspective on it.  Similarly conflict between Hadrat Ali and Hadrat Ameer Muavia etc.  According to this, probably the "scholar" called Zakir Naik is guilty as well for saying "razi allah" after Yazid's name.  Some Muslim sects suggest that Hadrat Imam Hussain was also at fault in the tragedy of Karbala.  Can Muslims not even discuss their own history openly?

Real Story
In fact these laws were originally made just to target Ahmadi Muslims and are brainchild of General Zia ul Haq.  But lets not blame him for everything the "elected" legislators have ratified all of these laws.  The problem is that when you make bad laws, they will end up shaking the foundation of a society even if the target was someone else - because such laws provide an opportunity.


That is what happened here as well.  Ahmadies are still the largest victim of these laws but people have now started using these laws to settle old scores and to push their point.  


In lieu of this, the stance of the late governor was quite timid.  Anything short of total repeal should be unacceptable to any decent human being - yet he was targeted and most people blame him for his own murder.  But then we are talking about decent humans and there are probably none left in Pakistan.



Thursday, June 10, 2010

Jamaat Islami Amir called for bombing of the Nato Trucks

Keeping its tradition of calling for disorder in the land, Jamaat Islami Amir Mr. Munawwar Hasan in his Friday sermon of June 6, 2010 called for the bombing NATO caravans.  As ususal the tragedy of Pakistan is that there are plenty of idiots who say "labbaik" on such calls.  The exact words of Mr. Munawwar were:

"... Those who only talk about following what Allah and His prophet (peace be on him) has said need to realize that this task (referncing the NATO operations in Afghanistan) will beome more difficult over time.  We have so far tolerated the drone attacks while our folks were not even getting food to eat.  Very rarely, if ever, do we hear a news that a NATO caravan has been attackedEverything goes there after traveling through our country.  If NATO is fighting Muslims, they are doing so with the help of Muslims which include you and I.  Do you think Allah will not ask us on the day of judgement that (NATO) tankers were moving towards Afghanistan right in front of your eyes and you did not do anything?  They were huge trucks that carried food and supplies for the NATO troops.  This was happening when you yourself were living a life of extreme poverty.  You had opened up all of your roads for them to travel.  A lot of roads have been constructed in Baluchistan province to allow the NATO caravans to travel.  These roads have been built for the benefit of these caravans and not for your benefit. ..." (minutes 33:00 till 34:22).  After that he went on to glorify the current Jihadi movements.

Then on June 9, 2010 militants attacked dozens of trucks carrying NATO supplies in Pakistan near Islamabad.  The assault killed seven people.  All victims are believed to be Pakistani.  According to the news:

Militants and ordinary criminals have often attacked NATO and U.S. supply convoys over the past two years, but Wednesday's strike was the first so close to the well-protected capital, something likely to cause particular unease 

The full news can be read at http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/06/09/523041/militants-attack-nato-convoy-in.html

The Friday sermon can be heared in its entirety from http://www.smunawar.com/ (unless they remove it)

So, is this excusable?  Are these Pakistanies doing Jihad by blowing up NATO tankers within Pakistan and killing Pakistanis?  What is Jamaat Islami preaching? and should Pakistanis standy by and accept such calls for rebellion within the borders of Pakistan?  Why do Pakistanis act surprised when attacks happen in Pakistan.  The Mullahs are not hiding their agenda - they say in clear terms that "war is on" - it is the "silent majority" that needs to say something.  It should be a simple principled stance that no one is allowed to create disorder in the land (which is exactly according to Quran) regardless of their beliefs or policy differences.

Saturday, June 05, 2010

Jamat Islami hijacking "qaum's" sentiments

http://jamaat.org/beta/site/general_detail/news/1007

The Jamaat Islami's English website did not have a translation, so I have translated it below for English Speaking audience:

Nation will not tolerate a soft corner for Qadianies.  Mian Nawaz Sharif's statement has hurt the feelings of the nation.
 Spokes Person, Jamaat Islami
Lahore 5 June 2010.  Dr. Fareed Ahmad Paracha, spokesman Jamaat Islami Pakistan, has expressed deep regret over the statement of the president of Pakistan Muslim League (N) Mr. Nawaz Sharif where Mr. Sharif called Qadianies his brethren and an asset for Pakistan.  In his statement released from Mansoora, Mr. Paracha said that the whole Muslim world and Pakistan agree over the issue of declaring the Qadianies  non-Muslim.  And the nation will not tolerate a soft corner for the Qadianies.  He said that the damage caused by Qadianies to Islam and Muslim Umma is unforgivable.  He also said that Qadianies have dared to blaspheme against the Holy Prophet and in this regard they are continuing in their efforts.  Mr. Paracha said that Mian Nawaz Sharif's statement at this time, when the whole Muslim world is in a state of deep shock due to the cartoon controversy, has deeply hurt the feelings of the nation.   Any expression of solidarity with the Qadianies, who blaspheme against the Holy Prophet, must be condemned.  He said that Qadianies once again have launched a campaign to regain their status as a Muslim, to end the Anti-Qadiani ordinance, and to end the blasphemy laws.  And in this regard they are doing press conferences.  Mr. Paracha sad that Mr. Sharif's statement must be seen in this backdrop.  Mr. Paracha said that Mr. Nawaz Sharif must clarify his position regarding the status of the Qadianies, blasphemy laws, and anti-Qadiani ordinance. 

And to put things in context, here is what Mr. Nawaz Sharif said:

He also termed terrorists attack at the worship places of Ahmadis in model town and Ghari Shahu condemnable adding that Ahmadis are our brethren and asset for the country. He also informed that the elements involved in firing at Ahmadis worship places have been arrested and law enforcement agencies have been carrying out investigations with them.

So what is "qaum's" reaction to such a statement?  With respect to the allegations against the Ahmadi Muslims an honest reader is welcome to decide for themselves based on our literature.  Our website http://www.alislam.org has a lot of books on the subject.  Here is a sample:

And specifically addressing the cartoon controversy, our present leader Ameer-ul-Momineen Hadrat Mirza Masroor Ahmad's writings and lectures:
Here is a list of several books on the subject http://www.alislam.org/holyprophet/index.html

In addition to this Ahmadi Muslims all over the world were busy in using their pen in defense of our beloved prophet (sa) and doing seminars to celebrate his life in addition to educating the western public about the sensitivity of the issue while other groups were rioting in Muslim world over the issue.


An organization that calls itself "Jamaat Islami" (Organization for Islam) has made lies its core value and instigation along with rebellion its mode of operation.  Inna lillah e Wa inna Illaihi rajeoon

And there are several other books on the subject that you can see at http://www.alislam.org/books/


Tuesday, June 01, 2010

Hypocrisy of the Pakistani Muslims

Ever wonder why the suide bombers are always so young?  Do the "virgins" in heaven have a prejudice against middle age and older men?  Shouldn't a terrorist in his fifties or sixties be more inclined to rush to "heaven"?

The reason is that the ideology that is taught in Pakistan's "Islamic Studies" demands a degree of hypocricy from the students that younger age is unable to provide.  Following concepts are openly taught in public schools by such teachers.  The message is even more direct and extreme in the Madrasas and during the Friday sermons:

  1. Apostacy (giving up Islam as one's religion) is a crime that is punnishable by death
  2. Blasphemy against Prophet Muhammad (may peace be upon him) is a crime that is punnishable by death.  Note that this is supported by the laws in Pakistan as well and laws do not define blasphemy thus leaving the laws open for abuse. 
  3. Ahmadies are not Muslims.  This is also supported by the laws of Pakistan.  2nd ammendment to the Pakistan constitution declares Ahmadi Muslims to be non-Muslim.  Since Ahmadies call themselves Muslim, this automatically turns them into apostates in the eyes of common folk.
  4. Pakistan is an "Islamic" country and it is bound by her constitution to implement Islamic laws.
Capital punnishment in any society is reserved for the worst crimes.  What is a sixteen year old supposed to make out of these instructions that are taught in public schools?  Isn't that sixteen year old justified in thinking that it is his duty to stop these crimes?  How can Pakistan as a whole claim innocence when such crimes are committed?  Some "mullahs" say "but we don't teach them to kill, we just teach them the rules but tell them that it is the duty of the state not of the individuals".  That is the worst type of hypocricy and they have the nerve to say this in public on public televisions as an excuse that absolves them.  The media anchor on the other end just agrees with them.  What a sad story!

Rebellions have happened in many societies throughout the history and in that Taliban are not a new phenomenon.  What is interesting is that Taliban hit at the heart of those they want to revolutionize and those who are getting hit still sympathize with them.  The society as a whole has created an "assembly line" where if drones kill 10 taliban, Madrisas graduate 100.  The so called "moderates" in Pakistan then make it their duty to find excuses for the Taliban or blame someone else; India and US are common scapegoats.

Pakistan is suffering from a cancer but sadly the people think it is just a common cold which will go away if only if US stops drone attacks.  First Pakistanis need to realize that it is a cancer and that they themselves are feeding the cancer - not someone from outside.  They need to confront their hypocricy and turn their "religious principles" to:

  1. Pakistan guarentees absolute religions freedom where everyone can follow whatever religion they follow.
  2. Freedom of thought and speech is absolute and no one is going to be punnished for "blasphemy"
  3. State has no business in defining people's religions.  If someone wants to consider Ahmadies as non-Muslims, they are free to do so but "for the purpose of constitution", Muslim is anyone who claims to be so.
Unless Pakistanis change their thought process on these lines, they need to realize that there is still a lot of room for Pakistan to drop.  Looks like "Asfala Safileen" applies to Pakistan quite aptly.

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's revelations about Lahore

Following are some of the revelations of Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) Promissed Messiah and Mehdi about Lahore.  I am including the words as they exist in Tadhkira (http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Tadhkirah.pdf) without any editorial comments.  Only Allah understands the complete meaning and implications of such prophecies.  May Allah have mecy on us.

  1. Tadhkira Page 514
    • December 13, 1900 There are our pure members in Lahore. They should be informed. They are made of fine clay. Doubt will be removed but the clay will remain. In the context of the acceptance of revelation the weakest was the maulavi. All maulavis will be exposed. [Arabic] [I am Allah the Bountiful. I shall certainly stand with My Messenger.] [al-Hakam, vol. 4, no. 45, December 17, 1900, p. 2]
  2. Tadhkira Page 514
    • December 13, 1900
    We have pure friends in Lahore. Doubt has arisen but the clay is fine; doubt will be removed but the clay will remain. [al-Hakam, vol. 4, no. 29, August 17, 1902, p. 12]
    • Tadhkira Page 919
      • February 20, 1907 (1) [Arabic] I shall stand with My Messenger and shall rebuke the one who rebukes him. (2) [Urdu] A scattered host. (3) [Urdu] A sorrowful news has been received. The Promised Messiah[as] said: It passed through my mind, after I woke up, that this last revelation might relate to some of our friends in Lahore. The revelation might possibly have the same import.
    • Tadhkira Page 955
      • [Urdu] A sad piece of news has been received from Lahore. Because of the revelation, I sent a man to Lahore to find out about our friends there, but one did not know that the revelation would be fulfilled a few days later. [Badr, vol. 6, no. 27, July 4, 1907, p. 7]
    • Tadhkira Page 1060
      • [Urdu] There used to be a city called Lahore as well.     Note by Hadrat Maulana Jalal-ud-Din Shamsra: The prophecy about the destruction of Lahore that was published during the life of the Promised Messiahas is the following:  
        It is said that the soil of Lahore contains elements which exterminate the plague germs. But plague has also taken hold there. People still do not know, but after several years they will see what will happen. A number of people and villages will be completely wiped out. The world will forget about them and there will remain no trace of them. But such would never be the case with Qadian. 
          [al-Hakam, vol. 8, no, 23 and 24, July 17, 24, 1904, p. 12]  

    Thursday, February 04, 2010

    Talibanization of Europe Part 2

    I had earlier commented on the Swiss intolerance when they banned religious buildings of a certain type (http://saadahmad.blogspot.com/2009/12/talibanization-of-swiss.html). An interesting twist to that story was that even though most of the world, including European Union, condemned that – there was one certain bigot from France that said that he understood it; who was he? French president Sarkozy (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/08/sarkozy-sympathises-minaret-ban-switzerland)


    Just like a TV drama, this European bigotry now enters it next episode and now Sarkozy’s France takes the lead. Target – Muslim women who choose to dress a certain way (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/19/veil-burka-france-muslim-women). What a way to liberate women – by taking away their freedom to dress the way they want. Our president Obama puts it correctly when he said: “It is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit – for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We cannot disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism…”.

    And just like the Swiss vote, this is not a marginal section of French population that is suggesting it. Over 57% of the French in a survey favored such a ban – what a liberal society. A woman becomes naked in public to please the male audience – she is liberated; another woman covers herself so that she is judged for who she is – French cannot tolerate her on the street.

    These episodes are not isolated. This is a European phenomena and the next episode is already in the works. This time the equation of bigotry from among the Taliban style Muslims and Hitler’s Europe goes head to head in Netherlands (http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5814DH20090902). Here a heartless Arab group published some cartoons about the holocaust – they are being charged for being “discriminatory” but the same nation took pride in republishing the cartoons of Prophet Muhammad under the guise of freedom of speech.

    Our country needs to look at these episodes with grave concern. Europe has a history of such attitudes towards its own citizens. For hundreds of years they have taken pride in such actions. As always they would make a mess and then we will be called in to fix it for them. The people who want to cover themselves a certain way in France or want to build their places of worship a certain way in Switzerland are born and bred in those countries. How is the behavior of these “enlightened” countries any different from the Taliban in Afghanistan who wanted to impose their “sharia” on their citizens. It is these attitudes which when left unchecked lead to the wide spread hostilities later on and may even lead to another holocaust and then people would wonder how they missed the signs!

    Sunday, December 06, 2009

    A comprehensive solution for our economic woes

    Should we give more money to GM? Is Citibank the missing link in our path to recovery? Will we fix everything by solving the mortgage crises? If we gave every American ten more dollars every month, would that fix the economy?

    We see questions like these every few decades and in various locales. Responses range from Nazism to communism; from socialism to unbridled capitalism; from the “new deal” to the “tax cuts”. Are these enduring philosophies?

    Islam provides the only comprehensive and permanent solution to today’s financial woes that addresses our psychological deficiencies, our moral decadence, and certain aspects of our policies.
    Greenspan stated in a recent interview that “the innate human responses result in swings between euphoria and fear that repeat themselves generation after generation with little evidence of a learning curve”. Interestingly Islam tells us that unbridled capitalism will lead to our destruction (102:2-3). Our political leaders should ponder over this and understand that we need effective regulations to ensure that such forces do not run amuck.

    Islam leaves room for free enterprise but rejects the flawed view that “money begets money.” Many of the billionaires listed in Forbes attribute their wealth to “investments.” While we need institutions to facilitate the circulation of wealth, we cannot let this be an end in itself. Making this the goal divorces the investors from the art of making a profit through entrepreneurial activities and instead results in financial catastrophes, such as the current mortgage meltdown.

    Usury is forbidden in Islam. Economists suggest that such vehicles are an essential component of the overall system but Islam cautions us that it will lead to our destruction. It is interesting to see how we lower interest rates to rejuvenate the economy without acknowledging, as Islam does, the need to abolish it completely (2:276,277,280). Such interest encourages the hoarding of wealth and other reckless activity.

    Islam rejects the practice of gambling (2:220). In modern times, unfortunately, this has taken center-stage in our economic system; from individuals who borrowed “betting” that their home will go up in price to banks who “gambled” on individuals paying, to the idea of selling that “risk” to other banks; is but a game of dice.

    Islam emphasizes the circulation of wealth and suggests that uncirculated wealth should be taxed. Islam understands the need for such cash reserves, but for the greater good of the society, suggests that such money be appropriately taxed. The main beneficiary of such a tax should be the poor – those who did not enjoy the luxury of having such cash reserves.

    Islam lays great importance to “straight talk” or saying the “right word” (33:71). In business one may be legally truthful while still being deceptive. Several banks violated this principle when they offered loans to those who could not afford it. Then they carried on their deception when they sold those bad loans to other institutions.

    Finally, Islam presents our life as a struggle between God and the world and establishes God as the purpose of our lives (51:57). Rejecting God puts us at the mercy of our vain pursuits including that of accruing wealth (57:21). Islam teaches us to control our desires and to reign in our jealousy regarding material wealth (20:132). These verses caution those who borrow beyond their means.

    Islam offers a unique approach for addressing today’s crisis. It focuses on the disease rather than the symptoms. This disease can deteriorate into Nazism, Communism, Radicalism, and chaos – so we need to address this positively and without preconceived notions.
    A comprehensive translation of the Quran may be referenced at http://www.alislam.org.

    Talibanization of the Swiss

    by
    Saad Ahmad

    Can Talibanization be narrowly defined as a specific dogma or set of rituals; or does it personify a more subtle and deep-rooted trouble with diversity? I think it is the latter and as such Taliban of Afghanistan have more in common with Hitler’s Nazis than with any other sect or religion. Such intolerance may manifest itself more brutally in poorer societies and may take the form of a “vote” in more “civilized” societies but at the end it is based on the same core set of values – or lack of them.

    Just when we think that we have moved far enough from the horrors of holocaust, Europe reminds us that they are still quite capable of repeating it. Whether it is the French ban on certain forms of Muslim dress, German “contracts” for integration, and now to top it – the Swiss “vote” against buildings of a certain architectural characteristic: (http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/11/29/switzerland.minaret.referendum/index.html) – they all stem from the same underlying hostility that Europeans have often shown to their own brethren. Centuries ago it took the form of black death, then it looked like holocaust and in a few decades it will probably result in an effort to expel Muslims.

    Sure, Swiss will try to disguise their utter intolerance as “democratic process” but let us not forget that even Nazis came to power in a sort of democratic exercise. This word does not cover the underlying hatred that people may feel about another group. Some will quickly start comparing this to how churches are treated in Muslim countries – thus proving the point that these European countries are striving to become Saudi Arabia and not a free and open society like US.

    One has to wonder what the real difference is between banning a certain form of architecture, as the Swiss did; or destroying it after the fact; as done by Taliban with the various Budha’s statues? Both stem from the same underlying hostility and show how Swiss have much in common with the Taliban. Not too far from Switzerland France showed the same hostility earlier by banning certain forms of dress for Muslim women. So the only difference between them and Taliban is with respect to fashion preference. Overall the world needs to be very concerned about what is going on over there because it is entirely possible that in a few decades, US will be called on once again to clean up their mess. US needs to tell Europe in clear terms to clean up their mess and reign in these forces which are turning the clock back for Europe.


    A minaret itself is of no significance in Islam. A mosque is a place of worship and is quite complete without such architectural enhancements. What should be troubling is the trend of intolerance that is growing rapidly in Europe. The people who want to cover themselves a certain way in France or want to build their places of worship a certain way in Switzerland are born and bred in those countries. How is the behavior of these “enlightened” countries any different from the Taliban in Afghanistan who wanted to impose their “sharia” on their citizens. It is these attitudes which when left unchecked lead to the wide spread hostilities later on and may even lead to another holocaust and then people would wonder how they missed the signs!

    Tuesday, November 28, 2006

    Muslims Remove from US Airways Flight 300

    Published in Oshkosh NorthWestern - Dec-6-2006

    The news about the behavior of some of our small minded countrymen on US Airways flight 300 ( http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15824096/) prompted me to write this letter. If educated people like Airline Captains can act like narrow minded bigots and the Airline Executives lack the decency and assertiveness to apologize for the obvious disregard for civil rights – then we have a long way to go as a nation. This also suggests that we as Muslims need to do more in terms of educating our fellow citizens.

    Muslims are required to pray five times a day. We are strongly encouraged to say our prayers in congregation. In that setting one person leads the prayer and others stand behind him. During these prayers, the leader recites some Arabic verses from the Quran so that the followers may be able to listen. An often stereo typed phrase of "Allah Akbar" is said several times during the prayer and it means that the God is great. When this is said we are referring to the God of Abraham.

    So next time when you see some people who gather, face north-east, and offer prayers – just know that they are praising the God of Abraham, Moses, and Jesus. When they say "Allah Akbar" do not panic; they just affirmed the belief of the Biblical prophets. Take that as an opportunity to learn about the faith that is practiced by more than one fifth of the planet. Prayer is meant for God and to bring His people together – not to create such a bitter divide. I would also encourage the local Muslims to arrange seminars to improve the understanding of Islam. May God improve our mutual understanding - Amen.

    More information about Islam may be found at http://www.alislam.org or contact me at saad.ahmad@gmail.com

    Friday, September 22, 2006

    Short version of Response to Pope Benedict XVI’s Lecture that he delivered on Tuesday September 12 2006

    Published in Oshkosh NorthWestern Sep-24-2006

    Pope Benedict XVI in his recent lecture reflected upon the importance of reason in understanding the faith. His point being that domain of rationality and reason extends beyond the limits of empirical evidence. He also mentioned Islam as being fundamentally opposed to rational thought and that its spread was through force. In this short essay I would provide an Islamic perspective.

    Islam and Rationality
    The Quran fully acknowledges the role of rationality in attainment of the truth. There are around 750 verses in the Holy Quran that exhort the believers to study nature, to reflect and make best use of reason and to make scientific enterprise an integral part of a community’s life.[i]

    Islam’s invitation to the mankind is primarily on rational grounds and not through force. Verse 2:257 quoted by the pope actually relies on Islam’s rationality for its appeal and not on force; and to his point of “later verses somehow changing the message” Quran emphatically rejects such notions and declares that no verse of Quran abrogates another verse and there are no inconsistencies (4:83).

    It is the duty of every Muslim to invite others to Islam – but through the best of manners (16:126). Quran invites other religions and philosophies to a dialog and to bring forth their proof: (e.g. 2:112, 4:175, 21:25, 27:65, 28:76).

    Those who do not study Islam are astonished by its rapid progress. People were drawn towards it because of its rationality and reasonable basis – not because of any fear. This is a real miracle that has been recorded by history unlike the phantom miracles that other religions put forth.

    Islamic Concept of God
    In order to give credence to his faulty premise, the pope attributed this to Islamic concept of God. Islam’s view of God is much different than Christianity. It is more evolved and not bound by trivial ideas like “one is three and three is one”. Islam is a strictly monotheistic religion where there is only one God who is unique.

    Islam does not put forth an idea that only way to know the God is by believing in some mortal as a part of the godhead; or that that god was dead for three days; or that god is so powerless that he had to kill his only begotten son to forgive the sins of mankind. Islam totally rejects a god that would kill an innocent in order to absolve others of their crimes and sins.

    God of Islam is not limited by human imagination but the ability to recognize Him has been imprinted on the human psyche. He can be recognized through His attributes but at that same time His attributes do not have a limit. Some of His attributes can be metaphorically compared to human attributes and some of His attributes can be seen in His creation in a limited capacity. So the being of God is hidden to those who are not willing to find Him but those who strive would find God everywhere.

    Conclusion
    It is Christianity and especially the Church that has traditionally opposed rationality and reason. The various episodes of Galilio and Newton are well known. The “rational” tradition of “witch hunts” is an integral part of the Catholic history. Trinity, original sin, resurrection, and rapture all have been challenged by the secular scholars on rational grounds. Today’s catholic beliefs are more like the pagan beliefs of that era and far removed from the true and pure teachings of Jesus Christ.

    Islam on the other hand is well founded in human psyche. It is a strictly monotheistic religion with evolved concepts of God, revelation, afterlife, and prophet hood. Islam’s strength is its reasonableness and it does not need force for its progress.

    I hope that the pope takes time to understand Islam and actually read the Holy Quran before quoting it. Today Islamic and Christian civilizations are facing each other in the most unfriendly confrontation ever witnessed in the history. Inter faith dialogues evolve through mutual understanding and not by maligning the other religion – even if it is done in the guise of “I quote I quote”.



    [i] LAI, C.H. KIDWAI, A (1989) Ideals and Realities, Selected Essays of Abdus Salam. 3rd ed. World Scientific Publishing Co, London pp. 343-344.

    Sunday, September 17, 2006

    Response to Pope Benedict XVI’s Lecture that he delivered on Tuesday September 12 2006

    By
    Saad Ahmad
    Saad.ahmad@gmail.com

    Pope Benedict XVI in his recent lecture reflected upon the importance of reason in understanding the faith. His point being that domain of rationality and reason extends beyond the limits of empirical evidence. He further pointed out that Christianity’s original encounter with Greek philosophy enhanced the Christian thought. In making this point he also mentioned Islam as being fundamentally opposed to rational thought. He said that Islam’s spread was primarily through force and had little to do with rationality and reason. In this short essay I would provide an Islamic perspective.

    Islam and Rationality
    The pope has shown his ignorance of Islamic thought by mentioning some quotes from another Christian – giving no importance to the original Islamic text, i.e. Quran; which unlike the Christian Bibles is still available in its original form. There are two types of people; those who do not know and those who do not know that they do not know – pope has shown that he belongs to the latter group.

    Islam’s message is universal and as opposed to other religions whose claim to universality was an afterthought of its followers Islam’s claim was made over 1500 years ago in the Quran.

    And we have not sent thee but as a bearer of glad tidings and a Warner, for all the mankind, but most know not. (34:29)

    So by claiming to be a universal religion for all times, all races, and all religions Islam has challenged other philosophies on purely rational grounds because no religion with an element of irrationality can be acceptable to the universal consciousness of man.[i]

    The Quran fully acknowledges the role of rationality in attainment of the truth – whether religions or secular.

    Truth is the religion of Islam, Islam is the religion of Truth[ii]

    Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)’s constant prayer was:

    God! Grant me knowledge of the ultimate nature of things[iii]

    Impressed by this emphasis on knowledge, Professor Dr. Abdus Salam, the renowned Nobel Laureate said:

    According to Dr. Mohammad Aijazul Khatib of Damascus University nothing could emphasize the importance of sciences more than the remark that “in contrast to 250 verses which are legislative, some 750 verses of the Holy Quran – almost one eighth of it – exhort the believers to study nature – to reflect, to make the best use of reason and to make the scientific enterprise an integral part of the community’s life”. The Holy Prophet of Islam – peace be upon him – said that it was the “bounden duty of every Muslim – man and woman to acquire knowledge.[iv]

    Islam’s invitation to the mankind is primarily on rational grounds and not through force. The pope hinted that

    … The emperor must have known that surah 2,256 reads: “There is no compulsion in religion”. According to the experts, this is one of the suras of the early period, when Muhammad was still powerless and under threat. But naturally the emperor also knew the instruction, developed later and recorded in the Quran, concerning holy war.

    This idea stems from his obvious prejudice against Islam and his lack of knowledge about the religion. If he only took the time to read the rest of the verse:

    There is no compulsion in religion. Surely, the right way has become distinct from error; so whosoever refuses to be led by those who transgress, and believes in Allah, has surely grasped a strong handle which knows no breaking. And Allah is All-Hearing, All-Knowing. (2:257)

    So Islam relies on the strong rational basis of the religion to keep the followers within its fold and not on force. It relies on the “right being distinct from the wrong in the eyes of the believers” and not on coercion. And to his point of “later verses somehow changing the message” Quran emphatically rejects such notions:

    Will they not, then, meditate upon the Quran? Had it been from anyone other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much disagreement (4:83)

    No verse of Quran abrogates another verse and all of them paint a consistent picture of tolerance and rational argument. It is the duty of every Muslim to invite others to the message of Islam through reason and wisdom – and not through force. Allah says in the Holy Quran:

    Invite to the path of thy Lord with wisdom and comely admonishment and dispute with them in the best of manners (16:126)

    As quoted earlier number of verses that exhort Muslims to use reason and rationality add up to 750. Against this not a single verse can be found that advocates irrational dogmatic invasion of the world.

    Following are some of those verses:

    Do you enjoin others to do what is good and forget your own selves, while you read the Book? Will you not then understand?(2:45)

    And they say, ‘None shall ever enter Heaven unless he be a Jew or Christian’. These are their vain desires. Say, ‘Produce your proof, if you are truthful’. (2:112)

    O ye people, a manifest proof has indeed come to you from your Lord, and We have sent down to you a clear light (4:175)

    And worldly life is nothing but a sport and pastime. And surely the abode of the Hereafter is better for those who are righteous. Will you not then understand? (6:33)

    Have they taken gods beside Him? Say, ‘Bring forth your proof. Here is the Book of those with me, and the Book of those before me’. Nay, most of them know not the truth, and so they turn away. (21:25)

    … Is there a God besides Allah? Say, ‘Bring forward your proof if you are truthful’ (27:65)

    And We shall draw from every people a witness and We shall say, ‘Bring your proof.’ Then they will know that the truth belongs to Allah. And that which they used to forge will be lost unto them. (28:76)

    The verses mentioned above are only a few of the many verses that invite the people to reason and rational thinking in order to arrive at the truth. Those who do not study Islam are often astonished by the rapid progress and spread of the religion. They do not realize that the real reason behind the spread of Islam is the power of reason and rationality. People were drawn towards the message because of its beauty and wonder – not because of any fear. This is a real miracle that has been recorded by history unlike the phantom miracles that other religions put forth – and that becomes a point of sore jealousy for the likes of the pope.

    Islamic Concept of God
    The pope has put forth a faulty argument about rational thinking in Islam and then he rationalizes the faulty premise by putting forth:

    But for Muslim teaching, God is absolutely transcendent. His will is not bound with any of our categories, even that of rationality.

    The pope is right about one thing – Islam’s view of God is much different than Christianity. It is certainly much more evolved and not bound by trivial ideas like “one is three and three is one”. Islam is a strictly monotheistic religion where there is only one God who is unique. Allah says in the Holy Quran:

    Say, ‘He is Allah, the One;’
    Allah, the Independent and Besought of all.
    He begets not, nor is He begotten.
    And there is none like unto Him . (112:2-5)

    Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad – the promised Messiah[v] (peace of Allah be upon him) describes the concept Allah as follows:

    In the language of the Noble Quran, Allah is the Perfect Being Who is rightfully adored, combining in Himself all perfect attributes, and free from every defect, the One without associate and the Source of all beneficence[vi]

    Islam does not put forth an idea that only way to know the God is by believing in some mortal as a part of the godhead. It does not put forth an idea where that same god prays “O God why have you forsaken me” when put on the cross. It certainly does not put forth an idea that god was dead for three days. It does not put forth a god that is so powerless that he had to kill his only begotten son to somehow forgive the sins of the mankind. It certainly does not put forth a “rational god” that assumes that killing an innocent is the way to absolve others of their crimes and sins.

    Islam’s view of God is certainly different from that. Islam certainly accepts that the God is not limited by human imagination – but it also tells us that human beings can know God and that ability has been imprinted on the human psyche.

    The promised Messiah Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (peace of Allah be upon him) writes:

    … the Exalted and Lord of blessings says: O My servants, know Me through My attributes and recognize Me through My excellences. I certainly do not suffer from any defect or shortcoming. Nay, My Praiseworthiness far exceeds the highest limits of praise rendered by those who praise Me. You will not find in the heavens or in the earth any praiseworthy feature that is not to be found in My countenance. If you tried to count My excellences you would not be able to number them, even if you exerted yourselves hard and took pains like the dedicated. Search well then if you can light upon a praiseworthy merit that you do not find in Me or can discover an excellence that is beyond Me and My Presence. If you feel that way then you have no knowledge of Me and are bereft of vision.[vii]

    Our God is our paradise. Our highest delight is in our God for we have seen Him and have found every beauty in Him. This wealth is worth procuring though one might have to lay down one's life to procure it. This ruby is worth purchasing though one may have to lose oneself to acquire it. Oh ye, who are bereft, run to this fountain and it will satisfy you. It is the fountain of life that will save you. What shall I do, and how shall I impress the hearts with this good news, and by beating what drum shall I make the announcement that this is our God, so that people might hear? What remedy shall I apply to the ears of the people so that they should listen?[viii]

    About rationally understanding the God, he (peace of Allah be upon him) says:

    The God of Islam is the same God who is visible in the mirror of the law of nature and is discernible in the book of nature. Islam has not presented a new God but has presented the same God Who is presented by the light of man's heart, by the conscience of man, and by heaven and earth[ix].

    Our soul and every particle of our being are prostrate before the Mighty, True and Perfect God from Whose hand j every soul and every particle of creation together with all its faculties came into being, and through Whose support every being is sustained. Nothing is outside His knowledge, or outside His control, or outside His creation. We call thousands of blessings and peace and mercy on the Holy Prophet Muhammad, the chosen one, through whom we have found the living God who gives us proof of His existence through His Word. He demonstrates to us through extraordinary signs His shining countenance which possesses eternal and perfect power. We found the Messenger who manifested God to us and we found the God who created everything through His perfect power. How majestic is His power that nothing came into being without it and nothing can continue to exist without its support. That true God of ours possesses numberless blessings, numberless powers, numberless beauties and beneficences. There is no other God beside Him.[x]

    And about understanding the God he (peace of Allah be upon him) says:

    God Almighty, in order to bestow perfect understanding upon His humble creatures has set out His attributes in the Holy Quran in two aspects. First, He has described His attributes metaphorically as resembling some human qualities, as for instance, He is Noble, Merciful, Beneficent and becomes angry and has love and He has hands and has eyes and possesses shanks and has ears and that through eternity He has created, though nothing has personal co- existence, but only co-existence as species and even that is not essential or the operation of His attribute of creation, for though creation is one of His attributes the manifestation of His Unity and Singleness is also part of His attributes. None of His attributes falls into permanent disuse, but a temporary cessation of its operation is permissible. Thus God manifested His attributes of resemblance to man. For instance, God is Creator, but to some degree man also creates or fashions; and man can be called noble for, up to a point, he possesses the quality of nobility; and man can be called merciful for, up to a point, he possesses the quality of mercy and the quality of anger; and he has eyes and ears etc. This could create a suspicion in one's mind that man resembles God in respect of these attributes, and God resembles man. To repel this God has mentioned in the Holy Quran as a contrast His attributes of transcendence also, i.e. such attributes of which man does not partake at all in his being or in his qualities. God's creation is not like man's creation, nor is God's mercy like man's mercy, nor is His wrath like man's anger, nor is His love like man's love, nor is He in need of space like man.[xi]

    He (peace of Allah be upon him) explains the limits of rationality as follows:

    The Being of God is hidden upon hidden and beyond of beyond and is most secret and cannot be discovered by the power of human reasoning alone, and no argument can prove it conclusively; inasmuch as reason can travel only so far that contemplating the universe it feels the need of a Creator. But the feeling of a need is one thing and it is quite another to arrive at the certainty that the God Whose need has been felt does in fact exist. As the operation of reason is defective, incomplete and doubtful, a philosopher cannot recognize God purely through reason. Most people who try to determine the existence of God Almighty purely through the exercise of reason, in the end become atheists. Reflecting over the creation of the heavens and the earth does not avail them much and they begin to deride and laugh at the men of God. One of their arguments is that there are thousands of things in the world which have no use and the fashioning of which does not indicate the existence of a fashioner. They exist merely as vain and useless things. These people do not seem to realize that lack of knowledge of something does not necessarily negative its existence. There are millions of people in the world who regard themselves as very wise philosophers and who utterly deny the existence of God. It is obvious that if they had discovered a strong reason for the existence of God, they would not have denied it. If they had discovered a conclusive argument in support of the existence God, they would not have rejected it shamelessly and in derision. It is obvious, therefore, that no one boarding the ark the philosophers can find deliverance from the storm of doubts, but is bound to be drowned, and such a one would ever have access to the drinking of pure Unity. It is a false and stinking notion that belief in the Unity of God can be achieved otherwise than through the Holy Prophet, peace be on him, nor can man achieve salvation without it. How can there be a faith in the Unity of God unless there is perfect certainty with regard to His existence? Be sure, therefore, that belief in the Unity of God can be achieved only through a Prophet, as our Holy Prophet, peace be on him, convinced the atheists and pagans of Arabia of the existence of God Almighty by showing them thousands of heavenly signs. Up till today the true and perfect followers of the Holy Prophet, peace be on him, present those signs to the atheists. The truth is that till a person observes the living powers of the living God, Satan does not depart from his heart, nor does true Unity enter into it, nor can he believe with certainty in the existence of God. This holy and perfect Unity is appreciated only through the Holy Prophet, peace be on him[xii]

    Conclusion
    It is Christianity and especially the Catholic Church that has traditionally opposed rationality and reason. The various episodes of Galilio and Newton are well known. The “rational” tradition of “witch hunts” is an integral part of the Catholic history. Throughout the Christian history rationality has been pitted against the religion. Christian ideas of trinity, original sin, resurrection, and rapture have been challenged by the secular scholars purely on rational grounds. It is strange that for the Church the person of Jesus is less important than the encounter with the Greek civilization. According to the pope:

    Today we know that the Greek translation of the Old Testament produced at Alexandria – the Septuagint – is more than a simple (and in that sense less than satisfactory) translation of the Hebrew text: it is an independent textual witness and a distinct and important step in the history of revelation, one which brought about this encounter in a way that was decisive for the birth and spread of Christianity.

    So for this pope Jesus’s (peace of Allah be upon him) words are of a far less value than this encounter. Today’s catholic beliefs are more like the pagan beliefs of that era and far removed from the true and pure teachings of Jesus Christ (peace of Allah be upon him).

    Islam on the other hand is well founded in human psyche. It is a strictly monotheistic religion with evolved concepts of God, revelation, afterlife, and prophet hood. Islam’s strength is its reasonableness and it does not need any sword for its progress. Where the Catholic Church needs the Lateran Councils[xiii] to develop the Christian beliefs; with Islam we can actually refer to the Quran that has been preserved exactly as it was revealed to the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him).

    I sincerely hope that the pope takes time to understand Islam and actually read the Holy Quran before quoting it. Today Islamic and Christian civilizations are facing each other in the most unfriendly confrontation ever witnessed in the history. Inter faith dialogues evolve through mutual understanding and not by maligning the other religion – even if it is done in the guise of “I quote I quote”.



    [i] Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Revelation, Rationality, Knowledge and Truth p255
    [ii] Ibid – p256
    [iii] Allah Muhammad Iqbal, The reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam p11
    [iv] LAI, C.H. KIDWAI, A (1989) Ideals and Realities, Selected Essays of Abdus Salam. 3rd ed. World Scientific Publishing Co, London pp. 343-344.
    [v] Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani (1835-1908) (may peace be upon him) founded Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam. He claimed to be the Promised Messiah and the Reformer for the latter days as prophesized by Holy Prophet Muhammad (may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). More information may be found at http://www.alislam.org
    [vi] Commentary on the Holy Quran Volume 1. Compiled from the writings and pronouncements of The Promised Messiah and Mahdi Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian. pp 71
    [vii] Ibid pp74
    [viii] Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (peace of Allah be upon him), Kishti Nooh p 19-20
    [ix] Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (peace of Allah be upon him), Tableegh-e-Risalat, Vol VI p15
    [x] Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (peace of Allah be upon him), Naseem-e-Dawat, (Qadian, Ziaul Islam Press, 1903); Now printed in Ruhani Khazain, Vol.19, p. 3
    [xi] Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (peace of Allah be upon him), Chashma Marifat, (Qadian, Anwar Ahmadiyyah Press, 1908); Now published in Ruhani Khazain (London, 1984), Vol. 23., pp. 260
    [xii] Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (peace of Allah be upon him), Haqiqatul Wahi, (Qadian, Magazine Press 1907); Now published in Ruhani Khazain (London, 1984), Vol. 22, pp. 117-118
    [xiii] A series of five important councils held at Rome from the twelfth to the sixteen century. From the reign of Constantine the Great until the removal of the papal Court to Avignon, the Lateran palace and basilica served the bishops of Rome as residence and cathedral. During this long period the popes had occasion to convoke a number of general councils, and for this purpose they made choice of cities so situated as to reduce as much as possible the inconveniences which the bishops called to such assemblies must necessarily experience by reason of long and costly absence from their sees. Five of these councils were held in the Lateran palace, and are known as the First (1123), Second (1139), Third (1179), Fourth (1215), and Fifth Lateran Councils. Other, non-ecumenical councils were held at the Lateran, among the best known being those in 649 against the Monothelite heresy, in 823, 864, 900, 1102, 1105, 1110, 1111, 1112, and 1116. In 1725, Benedict XIII called to the Lateran the bishops directly dependent on Rome as their metropolitan see, i.e. archbishops without suffragans, bishops immediately subject to the Holy See, and abbots exercising quasi-episcopal jurisdiction. Seven sessions were held between 15 April and 29 May, and various regulations were promulgated concerning the duties of bishops and other pastors, concerning residence, ordinations, and the periods for the holding of synods. The chief objects were the suppression of Jansenism and the solemn confirmation of the Bull "Unigenitus," which was declared a rule of faith demanding the fullest obedience. (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09016a.htm)

    Sunday, September 10, 2006

    Economic Justice

    By Saad Ahmad

    saad.ahmad@gmail.com>

    Published in Review of Religions May 2004


    Indeed Allah requires you to abide by absolute justice, to treat with grace, and to give like the giving of kin to kin.
    Ch. 16, Vs. 91

    In order to understand the concept of Economic Justice, I will first explain the concept of justice in general – its definition and importance. Then I will discuss its application in an economic system. After establishing the importance of justice in an economy I will discuss the approach that Islam takes to tackle the issue. Finally I will discuss some specific steps that Islam suggests in order to achieve economic justice.

    In preparation of this paper I have relied heavily on the Holy Quran. Along with that two books “Absolute Justice, kindness and Kinship” and “Islam’s response to Contemporary Issues” – both by Hadhrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, provided valuable guidance.

    Justice is not the end, it is the means that will lead to grace and then to a spontaneous expression of love and care as experienced by a mother for her child; who wouldn’t want to have a society like that… In-fact the desire for this ultimate objective, where the whole society is so harmonious that every one feels about the next person as their kin is a desire that is built in to the human psyche. All laws, philosophies, dogmas try to achieve this objective, Islam provides the way – and the first stop on this journey is justice – absolute justice that is.

    Absolute justice can be compared to the idea of Equilibrium and Balance in the physical world. An example can be seen in an ecosystem. A perfect balance exists between the Animal kingdom and the Plant kingdom; and this balance is responsible for the survival of the whole system. A slight deviation, like cutting some trees, killing some animals or introducing some new ones adversely affects the whole system.

    Justice is in play in all spheres of life and is essential for survival. Human beings are given free will, so the true absolute justice will be defined as a conscious effort to remain on this just path. For an illustration, visualize a bullet jetting out of a muzzle. From then on it is on a fixed path governed by the natural laws. If other factors, such as winds and change of medium, influence the bullet to deviate from this set course and if again the bullet had not only the consciousness but also the ability and strength to resist these influences and continue to maintain its trajectory unruffled, then that conscious effort to remain on the right path is what is termed as absolute justice.[i]

    Now that we have an understanding of the theory of absolute justice, lets explore its application in an economic system. Allah explained the fundamental principles of Economic Justice to Prophet Adam as follows:

    It is provided for thee that thou wilt not hunger therein, nor wilt thou be naked. And thou wilt not thirst therein, nor wilt thou be exposed to the sun.
    Ch. 20, Vs. 119-120

    Hence, at the economic level, the teachings of Adam comprise four fundamental rights granted to man at the very start of the formation of society. They are:
    · Every person has the right to be properly fed; none will remain hungry.
    · Every person has the right to be adequately clothed.
    · Every person is guaranteed a supply of healthy water.
    · None will be left without shelter.[ii]
    This is the paradise of Adam as depicted in the Holy Quran.

    Why, one would ask, is Islam trying to guarantee these rights? Isn’t it fashionable these days to say that one needs to earn these basic needs? Isn’t an expectation of these fundamental rights termed as free loading? Isn’t the popular phrase in today’s materialistic society – equality of opportunity not equality of equity? Aren’t you supposed to work for a living? Wouldn’t a society encourage laziness by guaranteeing these rights?
    Tough questions; for answer lets turn to the ultimate creation of the Almighty - the human body…

    First part of the answer deals with the concept of cause and affect; meaning what would happen if these rights were not respected. The natural laws will work against such a society. The members of a society that will utilize this right may not be the most vibrant contributors to the economy, they may not be paying the most taxes, they may not be the intellectuals and the thinkers; but nevertheless they are parts of the same whole. They are still part of the same body. Some parts of a human body contribute more to the bodily functions than others; mind is the king, heart is the government, immune system is the army, kidneys and lungs are the cleaning crew, blood vessels are the post office; all working vigorously toward the survival of the body… and then there is the small toe, lonely toe that no one cares about. That toe may not be contributing as much as the heart or the mind; but nevertheless it has some basic rights to blood, energy, nourishment etc. These rights are not a function of the organ’s contribution; why? Because health of the whole body will be adversely affected even if the least important organ is deprived of these basic necessities. Ignoring an injury to the toe may cause tetanus or some other disease causing grave suffering to the whole body.
    This is what will happen exactly in a society that does not guarantee the basic rights. If it does not guarantee the blood circulation to some organs from the point of view that they have done nothing to earn it; the society as a whole will suffer from painful diseases. We see implications of that every day in every society that does not follow this principle. We see young innocent children turning into gangsters and murderers. We see families losing their fathers to drugs and suicide. We see mothers abandoning their children. We see abortion on the rise. We see care on decline. We see apathy strengthening and empathy losing – all signs of a sick, infected, and diseased society. Why do we feel surprised on hearing such incidents? Allah has already told us the principle governing these outcomes. Allah has promised us that a guarantee of these rights will make this very world a heaven – consequently a lack of this awareness will make this world a hell.

    The second part of the answer deals with the ownership of the economy. There is no controversy, for example, over the right to breathe. No one is required to pay for breathing; why? Because air is no one’s property and the mode of its circulation, as chosen by the Almighty does not involve a payment system. Source of material wealth is none other, but the same God. For its distribution, He has established a different system involving human beings as the carriers; just like blood is carried one way in a human body and air as another. God is still the source, so He has the ultimate right to dictate the ground rules for its distribution. Allah tells us about this rule as follows:

    Allah multiplies the wealth of those who conform to His will. Bountiful is Allah, and All-knowing.
    Ch. 2 Vs. 262

    If heart pumps the blood to go toward the feet, no organ in between the two has any right to hoard the blood. No argument may be used to justify such an attitude by any organ, simply because it was not its blood to begin with. At any given time, one organ may be using more blood than the other, it may be using more resources than the other – but at no time is that organ the owner of those resources.

    The wealth of the society does not belong to individuals, as a capitalist might want; nor does it belong to the society, as a socialist may desire. It belongs to God and God alone. He is the only one who has the final right to decide on the methods of its distribution.

    Now that we have established the definition of absolute justice and its importance in an economic system, lets move toward the solution. What guidance is it that Allah provides us in this regard?
    Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, the fourth successor of the Promised Messiah, explain this as follows:

    In scientific socialism, an attempt is made to level-off the economic soil so completely and perfectly that there are no ups and downs left. If watered such a soil will get its share equally. There is no question of any demand from the have-nots nor any threat to the have-alls from the less fortunate sections of the society to forcibly rob them of their surplus wealth.
    In the capitalist society, they talk more of equal opportunities, level playing fields and free economies than of equal distribution of wealth. Thus there is always room for the demand of rights and the creation of pressure groups such as trade unions etc. which seek the most out of the government or other capitalists for the sake of the employee and the laborer who always live under a sense of depravation.
    If scientific socialism is implemented ideally, there is no need left for any section of society to make demands. Either that society would be rich enough to equitably distribute national wealth according to the needs or it would be so poor as to have failed to fulfill even the basic needs leaving every member of the society to share equally in the misery. Either way, it would end up as a society where demand no longer has a meaningful role to play.
    The capitalist system, on the other hand, is demand-oriented. The less fortunate section of the society must be given the right to express its dissatisfaction and a free opportunity to be heard: hence the need for the formation of pressure groups and strikes, industrial strife, lockouts etc.
    Islam attempts to create an attitude whereby the governments and the wealthy are constantly reminded that it is in their own ultimate interest to establish an equitable system. They are also constantly exhorted to be on the look out for the rights of others. The weak and the poor should not be denied their fundamental economic rights, such as freedom to chose one’s profession, equal access to opportunities, and the basic requirements of life – as discussed earlier. The lack of this very special attitude has already caused much misery, pain and disorder in the history of human struggle and survival. There is thus greater emphasis in Islam on giving than taking or keeping. The government and the wealthy must constantly be on the lookout lest there be a section of society which is deprived of the fundamental human right to live decently. A truly Godly state would have felt the need and taken appropriate measures for its fulfillment. Before grief turns into crises and protest and before the need threatens peace and order, the cause of grief must be removed and the need fulfilled.
    [iii]

    Islam is guaranteeing the same basic rights that a socialist system also promises but does not use the same coercive means to achieve that. Islam realizes that in any society there will be wealthy people and there will be poor people; just like in a human body some organs have access to more resources than the others. Islam’s approach is not so cold as dialectical materialism either. The Islamic social system remains deeply wedded to the innate laws of the human psyche. Islam attempts to raise the consciousness and sensitivity of a society, as a whole, to such a degree whereby members of a society as a whole are concerned more about what they owe to the society than what the society owes to them. Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him explains these ideas in his various sayings as follows:

    Give the laborer more than his dues. Pay him what he has earned before his sweat has dried out. Do not put those who serve under you to such tasks, as you cannot perform yourself. As far as possible, feed your servants with whatever you feed your family. Provide them with similar clothing. Do not transgress against the meek in any way, or you will be held responsible before God. Lest you succumb to false pride, occasionally make your servants sit on the same table with you and serve them. (Various Ahadith)[iv]

    And then there are the bad times. It is easy to be conscious of the rights of others when the economy is doing well; it is the recession and the economic hardships that make us careless. Allah tells us to spend in good cause even in adversity:

    The paradise which is as vast as the heavens and the earth, and has been prepared for those who take refuge in Allah, those who spend for the cause of Allah in prosperity and adversity, and who suppress their anger and who forgive men.
    Ch. 3 Vs. 134-135

    When economy is slower the first item on our list that is the victim of our budgeting is charity. We think that United Way, Salvation Army, or Red Cross will have to wait for better times in order to receive our checks. The Almighty is explaining us that even in the toughest times do not hold back on charity because it is those times that the poor are suffering the most. They need the most help when economy is at its worst.

    All civilized societies today have well-established institutions for charity and people do contribute toward those also; but the concept of alms, as generally understood, is double edged. On one hand, it pays compliment to the qualities of excellence of the donor; but on the other hand, it creates an embarrassing, if not disgraceful, image of the recipient. The very act of receiving alms degrades his status. Islam revolutionizes this concept. A fascinating analysis is made of why some people are poor and some are rich in the following verse of the Holy Quran:

    A part of their wealth comprises that which should by right have belonged to the one who asked for help, beggar, and the one who could not, the poor.
    Ch. 51 Vs. 20

    This verse is telling the donor that what he gives to the poor, in reality, did not belong to him anyway. Something has to be very wrong with an economy where some people are left destitute or compelled to beg for their survival. This is not a sign of a healthy economic system.

    The message delivered to the recipient is that there is no need for him to be embarrassed because, in fact, God has granted him the fundamental right to survive decently and honorably. So whatever your apparent benefactor is giving to you, is your own right which some how got transferred over to the donor. As mentioned earlier, God’s teachings are directly related to the human nature. Any injunction that is likely to disturb the equilibrium is counter balanced by corrective measures.

    An objection may be raised against this model on the grounds that this idea will promote free loading and the rights will be provided at the cost of decent behavior. To remove such ills, Allah turns to the recipients and says:

    If you are ungrateful, surely Allah is Self-Sufficient, being independent of you; and He is not pleased with ingratitude in His servants; but if you are grateful, He likes it in you.
    Ch. 39 Vs. 8

    Further emphasizing the point, the Holy Founder of Islam (peace be on him) reminds the believers:

    One who is not grateful to human beings is not grateful to God either.[v]

    The implication being that Allah will not accept gratitude from a person who is ungrateful to fellow human beings. This message of recipient’s rights is intended to be only a quiet message to the recipients so that they do not suffer from any inferiority complex and to safeguard their dignity. The inference is that; to express gratitude is not against the dignity of man: on the contrary it elevates him.

    On the other hand, Allah tells the donor that it is against his dignity to accept gratitude as if he deserved it. According to Islam, the service to mankind is for a higher purpose than to satisfy the natural urge or earn good reputation. The acts of kindness should be for the sake of the Almighty not for any material reasons. About such people Allah says:

    They feed, for love of Him, the poor, the orphan, the prisoner, even when they themselves stand in need saying: ‘We feed you for Allah’s pleasure only. We desire neither reward nor thanks from you’.
    Ch 76 Vs. 9-10

    To remove the potential ill of free loaders, Islam encourages spending more than receiving; Holy Founder of Islam (peace be on him) once said:

    The hand of the donor is better than that of receiver.[vi]

    And on another occasion he said:

    The upper hand is better than the lower hand.[vii]

    When Allah talks about giving and receiving it is not confined to the domain of money. Whatever Allah has given an individual should be spent in His cause. Allah says:

    And the true believers spend in Our cause of whatever we Ourselves have bestowed on them.
    Ch. 2 Vs. 4

    This covers all faculties, qualities, and also, of course, every type of material possession, human relationship and ties. The phrase also covers such values as honor, peace, comfort etc.

    By establishing this system Allah is giving us the recipe of a heavenly society where:
    · People give to others, not for personal gain, but only for the sake of the Almighty.
    · The donor does not expect any gratitude. He sincerely believes himself to be entrusted with the money so that it is distributed to the less fortunate.
    · The receiver expresses gratitude to the donor as well as to the Lord.
    · People in general want to give more than they receive.
    · People do not hesitate to donate their time, services, money, comfort, and any other material possession in the way of God.

    Surely, injustice will not find home in such a society.

    Understanding of this philosophy makes their hearts softer and more receptive to the divine guidance. Islam does not stop here, rather it goes a step further and provides some details. Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad explains this as follows in his book Islam’s Response to Contemporary Issues:

    Islamic economic system commences with the premise that all that is in the heaven and the earth has been created by God Who has bestowed man various provisions on trust. As a trustee, man will be held accountable for the discharge of this trust. The possession or absence of wealth is a means of trial so that both in abundance and adversity, those who are mindful of their accountability may be distinguished from those who resort to callousness and scant attention to the sufferings of the rest of the mankind.[viii]

    The most prominent tool that Islam uses to promote circulation of wealth in a society is the system of Zakat. Zakat is one of the five pillars of Islam. The Arabic word Zakat literally means to purify something and in the context of a mandatory levy would mean that the residual wealth after the deduction of Zakat had rendered it pure and lawful for the believers.
    Zakat is a tax on disposable assets above specific thresholds that have remained in the hands of the owners beyond one year. The exact percentage of this tax is flexible and is a function of the economic situation. The money thus collected can be utilized only for certain categories of expenditure – which have been spelled out in the Holy Quran as follows:

    Alms are for the poor and the needy, and for those employed in connection with their collection and distribution, and for those whose hearts are to be comforted, and for the freeing of slaves, and for those burdened with debt, and for those who are striving in the cause of Allah, and for the Wayfarers. This is an ordinance from Allah. Allah is All-Knowing, Wise.
    Ch. 9 Vs. 60

    The treasury is bound by this ordinance. No room is left here, for example, for using the collected tax for debt financing or anything of the sort. Money is collected and distributed; just like blood is distributed in the body.
    With Zakat, Islam sets forth another ordinance, that being prohibition of interest. According to Islam, money is meant to be circulated not hoarded. Expectation of growth of money without circulation, as expected by interest, is like storing blood in one part of the body, expecting that it will grow. Such blood will not grow – rather it will cause clotting and may lead to death. Islamic economic system promotes joint-ventures, investments, partnerships, shareholdings, business etc. – all means of circulation of wealth. The system of Zakat, where idle money is taxed, is intended to promote this system of circulation. If idle wealth is going to be taxed, people will be tempted to invest money into the society thus improving the health of the society. The system of the interest on the other hand promotes hoarding of wealth. The borrower is expected to pay the interest regardless of the economic condition. This encourages the companies to save up for hard times rather than investing into the society. Interest is like a parasite that eats away the very fabric of the economic system.

    Time is too short to go into all the details of the economic system suggested by Allah. Volumes have been written on the subject, my intention was to give a brief introduction to the Islamic philosophy in this area. I will end this paper with some verses from the Holy Quran which summarize the basis of this philosophy:

    To Allah belongs the Kingdom of the heavens and the earth; and Allah has power over all things (3:190)… Allah has favored some of you above others in worldly gifts (16:72)… Verily, Allah commands you to give over the trusts to those entitled to them (4:59)… Verily, your wealth and your children are a trial (64:16)… And the true believers spend in Our cause of whatsoever we Ourselves have bestowed upon them (2:4)… The flesh of the sacrificial animals reaches not Allah, nor their blood, but it is your righteousness that reaches Him (22:38)… Allah will abolish interest and will cause charity to increase (2:277) … In the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of the night and day there are indeed signs for men of understanding. Those who remember Allah, standing, sitting, and lying on their sides, and ponder over the creation of the heavens and the earth, say ‘Our Lord, Thou hast not created this in vain; Nay, Holy art Thou; save us then from the punishment of the fire (3:191-192).

    [i] Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Absolute Justice, Kindness and Kinship. Islam International Publications, p 26
    [ii] Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Absolute Justice, Kindness and Kinship. Islam International Publications, p 116
    [iii] Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Islam’s Response to Contemporary Issues. Islam International Publications, p 115
    [iv] Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Islam’s Response to Contemporary Issues. Islam International Publications, p 117
    [v] Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Islam’s Response to Contemporary Issues. Islam International Publications, p 119
    [vi] Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Islam’s Response to Contemporary Issues. Islam International Publications, p 123
    [vii] Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Islam’s Response to Contemporary Issues. Islam International Publications, p 124
    [viii] Hadrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, Islam’s Response to Contemporary Issues. Islam International Publications, p 144